PHP 5.6.0 released

pcntl_signal

(PHP 4 >= 4.1.0, PHP 5)

pcntl_signalInstalls a signal handler

Descrizione

bool pcntl_signal ( int $signo , callable|int $handler [, bool $restart_syscalls = true ] )

The pcntl_signal() function installs a new signal handler or replaces the current signal handler for the signal indicated by signo.

Elenco dei parametri

signo

The signal number.

handler

The signal handler. This may be either a callable, which will be invoked to handle the signal, or either of the two global constants SIG_IGN or SIG_DFL, which will ignore the signal or restore the default signal handler respectively.

If a callable is given, it must implement the following signature:

void handler ( int $signo )
signo
The signal being handled.

Nota:

Note that when you set a handler to an object method, that object's reference count is increased which makes it persist until you either change the handler to something else, or your script ends.

restart_syscalls

Specifies whether system call restarting should be used when this signal arrives.

Valori restituiti

Restituisce TRUE in caso di successo, FALSE in caso di fallimento.

Log delle modifiche

Versione Descrizione
4.3.0 The restart_syscalls parameter was added.
4.3.0 The ability to use an object method as a callback became available.
4.3.0 As of PHP 4.3.0 PCNTL uses ticks as the signal handle callback mechanism, which is much faster than the previous mechanism. This change follows the same semantics as using "user ticks". You must use the declare() statement to specify the locations in your program where callbacks are allowed to occur for the signal handler to function properly (as used in the example below).

Esempi

Example #1 pcntl_signal() example

<?php
// tick use required as of PHP 4.3.0
declare(ticks 1);

// signal handler function
function sig_handler($signo)
{

     switch (
$signo) {
         case 
SIGTERM:
             
// handle shutdown tasks
             
exit;
             break;
         case 
SIGHUP:
             
// handle restart tasks
             
break;
         case 
SIGUSR1:
             echo 
"Caught SIGUSR1...\n";
             break;
         default:
             
// handle all other signals
     
}

}

echo 
"Installing signal handler...\n";

// setup signal handlers
pcntl_signal(SIGTERM"sig_handler");
pcntl_signal(SIGHUP,  "sig_handler");
pcntl_signal(SIGUSR1"sig_handler");

// or use an object, available as of PHP 4.3.0
// pcntl_signal(SIGUSR1, array($obj, "do_something"));

echo"Generating signal SIGTERM to self...\n";

// send SIGUSR1 to current process id
posix_kill(posix_getpid(), SIGUSR1);

echo 
"Done\n";

?>

Note

pcntl_signal() doesn't stack the signal handlers, but replaces them.

Vedere anche:

add a note add a note

User Contributed Notes 22 notes

up
10
Zsolt Szilagyi
1 year ago
Remember that declaring a tick handler can become really expensive in terms of CPU cycles: Every n ticks the signal handling overhead will be executed.

So instead of declaring tick=1, test if tick=100 can do the job. If so, you are likely to gain fivefold speed.

As your script might always might miss some signals due to blocking operations like cURL downloads, call pcntl_signal_dispatch() on vital spots, e.g. at the beginning of your main loop.
up
6
webmaster at ajeux dot com
5 years ago
For PHP >= 5.3.0, instead of declare(ticks = 1), you should now use pcntl_ signal_ dispatch().
up
1
S. Kr@cK
2 years ago
static class method to get the name of a process signal as string:

(self::$processSignalDescriptions is used to cache the results)

<?php
   
public static function getPOSIXSignalText($signo) {

        try {
            if (
is_null(self::$processSignalDescriptions)) {

               
self::$processSignalDescriptions = array();

               
$signal_list = explode(" ", trim(shell_exec("kill -l")));
                foreach (
$signal_list as $key => $value) {
                   
self::$processSignalDescriptions[$key+1] = "SIG".$value;
                }
            }

            return isset(
self::$processSignalDescriptions[$signo])?self::$processSignalDescriptions[$signo]:"UNKNOWN";

        } catch (
Exception $e) {}

        return
"UNKNOWN";
    }
?>
up
2
rbotzer at yahoo dot com
6 years ago
You cannot assign a signal handler for SIGKILL (kill -9).
up
1
rob at robertjohnkaper dot com
7 years ago
Tip: when using objects, don't set the signal handler from the constructor or even a method called from the constructor - your internal variables will be uninitialised.
up
1
frustrated at outdated docs
5 months ago
Please be aware that declaring ticks or calling pcntl_signal_dispatch() in 5.3 and later is required to make pcntl_signal do anything useful. I wish the documentation made this more clear.
up
1
benjamin at josefus dot /NO+SPAM/ net
5 years ago
Since php >= 5.3 handles Closures, you are now able to define the Callback directly.
Try this:

<?php
declare(ticks = 1);

pcntl_signal(SIGUSR1, function ($signal) {
            echo
'HANDLE SIGNAL ' . $signal . PHP_EOL;
});

posix_kill(posix_getpid(), SIGUSR1);

die;
?>
up
0
Aurelien Marchand
3 years ago
I was having some issues with processing a signal using an object method I use for something else as well. In particular, I wanted to handle SIGCHLD with my own method "do_reap()" which I also call after a stream_select timeout and that uses a non-blocking pcntl_waitpid function.

The method was called when the signal was received but it couldn't reap the child.

The only way it worked was by creating a new handler that itself called do_reap().

So in other words, the following does not work:

<?php
class Parent {
 
/* ... */
 
private function do_reap(){
   
$p = pcntl_waitpid(-1,$status,WNOHANG);
    if(
$p > 0){
      echo
"\nReaped zombie child " . $p;
    }

   public function
run(){
   
/* ... */
   
pcntl_signal(SIGCHLD,array(&$this,"do_reap"));
   
$readable = @stream_select($read,$null,$null,5); // 5 sec timeout
   
if($readable === 0){
     
// we got a timeout
     
$this->do_reap();
   }
}
?>

But this work:

<?php
class Parent {
 
/* ... */
 
private function do_reap(){
   
$p = pcntl_waitpid(-1,$status,WNOHANG);
    if(
$p > 0){
      echo
"\nReaped zombie child " . $p;
    }

   public function
run(){
   
/* ... */
   
pcntl_signal(SIGCHLD,array(&$this,"child_died"));
   
$readable = @stream_select($read,$null,$null,5); // 5 sec timeout
   
if($readable === 0){
     
// we got a timeout
     
$this->do_reap();
   }

    private function
child_died(){
     
$this->do_reap();
    }
}
?>
up
0
ewout dot NOSPAM dot zigterman at custosys dot nl
5 years ago
I found out then when you use pcntl_signal in a 'deamon' script and you run it before you fork childs it does not work as expected.

instead you need to use pcntl_signal in the child code of the child you are forking

and if you want to cach signals for the 'deamon' part you should use pcntl_signal in the parent code.
up
0
seong at respice dot net
5 years ago
Be careful, when using an object in your callback. It seems this elevates the reference count. You may not want it to happen in repeated child processes.
up
0
Anonymous
6 years ago
Multiple children return less than the number of children exiting at a given moment SIGCHLD signals is normal behavior for Unix (POSIX) systems.  SIGCHLD might be read as "one or more children changed status -- go examine your children and harvest their status values".  Signals are implemented as bit masks in most Unix systems, so there can only be 1 SIGCHLD bit set in any given kernel tick for a process.
up
0
anxious2006
6 years ago
Under my setup (FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE / PHP 5.2.4 CLI) I've noticed that when a child exits the SIGCHLD handler in the parent is not always invoked. It seems to happen when two children exit near simultaneously.

In this instance the child prints "EXIT" and the parent prints "SIGCHLD received":

- EXIT
- SIGCHLD received

This works as expected, but now look what happens when three exit in quick succession:

- EXIT
- EXIT
- EXIT
- SIGCHLD received
- SIGCHLD received

Because of this quirk any code which tries to limit the maximum number of children by incrementing on fork and decrementing on SIGCHLD will eventually end up with a single child (or no further forks), since the "active children" count is always above the maximum. I've noticed similar behaviour with using decrement after pcntl_wait(). Hopefully there's a workaround for this.
up
0
nate at example dot com
7 years ago
If you have a script that needs certain sections to not be interrupted by a signal (especially SIGTERM or SIGINT), but want to make your script ready to process that signal ASAP, there's only one way to do it. Flag the script as having received the signal, and wait for your script to say its ready to process it.

Here's a sample script:

<?
    $allow_exit = true;  // are we permitting exit?
    $force_exit = false; // do we need to exit?

    declare(ticks = 1);
    register_tick_function('check_exit');
    pcntl_signal(SIGTERM, 'sig_handler');
    pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'sig_handler');

    function sig_handler () {
        global $allow_exit, $force_exit;

        if ($allow_exit)
            exit;
        else
            $force_exit = true;
    }

    function check_exit () {
        global $allow_exit, $force_exit;

        if ($force_exit && $allow_exit)
            exit;
    }

    $allow_exit = false;

    $i = 0;
    while (++$i) {
        echo "still going (${i})\n";
        if ($i == 10)
            $allow_exit = true;

        sleep(2);
    }
?>

You set $allow_exit to true at all times when it is perfectly acceptable that your script could exit without warning. In sections where you really need the script to continue running, you set $allow_exit to false. Any signals received while $allow_exit is false will not take effect until you set $allow_exit to true.

<?
    $allow_exit = true;

    // unimportant stuff here. exiting will not harm anything

    $allow_exit = false;

    // really important stuff not to be interrupted

    $allow_exit = true;

    // more unimportant stuff. if signal was received during
    // important processing above, script will exit here
?>
up
0
imslushie at hotmaildotcom dot com
7 years ago
I have been having trouble reaping my child process. It seemed most of the time, children were reaped properly but *sometimes* they would stay as zombies. I was catching the CHLD signal to reap child processes with the following code:

<?php

function childFinished($signal)
{
  global
$kids;
 
$kids--;
 
pcntl_waitpid(-1, $status);
}

$kids = 0;
pcntl_signal(SIGCHLD, "childFinished");
for (
$i = 0; $i < 1000; $i++)
{
  while (
$kids >= 50) sleep(1);
 
 
$pid = pcntl_fork();
  if (
$pid == -1) die('failed to fork :(');

 
/* child process */
 
if ($pid == 0)
  {
   
/* do something */
   
exit(0);
  }

 
/* parent */
 
else { $kids++; }
}

/* when finished, just clean up the children */
print "Reaping $kids children...\n";
while (
$kids) sleep(1);

print
"Finished.\n";
?>

The problem was, $kids never became zero so it would effectively wait forever. After wracking my brains (UNIX forks are new to me) I finally read the Perl IPC docs and viola, a solution! It turns out that because signal handlers are not re-entrant, my handler will not be called again while it is in use. The scenario that caused me trouble was that one child would exit and call the signal handler, which would pcntl_waitpid() it and decrement the counter. Meanwhile, another child would exit while the first child was still being reaped,  so the second would never get to notify the parent!

The solution was to continually reap children from the SIGCHLD handler, so long as there were children to reap. Here is the *fixed* childFinished function:

<?php

function childFinished($signal)
{
  global
$kids;

  while(
pcntl_waitpid(-1, $status, WNOHANG) > 0 )
   
$kids--;
}

?>
up
0
aeolianmeson at NOSPAXM dot blitzeclipse dot com
8 years ago
This issue occurs in at least PHP 5.1.2.

When a SIGINT is sent via CTRL+C or CTRL+BREAK, the handler is called. If this handler sends a SIGTERM to other children, the signals are not received.

SIGINT can be sent via posix_kill() and it work exactly as expected-- This only applies when initiated via a hard break.
up
0
aeolianmeson at NOSPAM dot blitzeclipse dot com
8 years ago
In at least version 5.1.4, the parameter passed to the handler is not a strict integer.

I have had such problems as trying to add the signal to an array, but the array is completely screwed up when viewed (but not viewed immediately after being added). This occurs when the handler is a method (array($this, 'methodname')), or a traditional functions.

To avoid this bug, typecast the parameter to an integer:
(note that each newline may appear to just be 'n'.)

<?php
print("pid= " . posix_getpid() . "\n");
declare(
ticks=1);
$arrsignals = array();

function
handler($nsig)
{
    global
$arrsignals;
   
$arrsignals[] = (int)$nsig;
    print(
"Signal caught and registered.\n");
   
var_dump($arrsignals);
}

pcntl_signal(SIGTERM, 'handler');

// Wait for signals from the command-line (just a simple 'kill (pid)').
$n = 15;
while(
$n)
{
   
sleep(1);
   
$n--;
}

print(
"terminated.\n\n");
var_dump($arrsignals);
?>

Dustin
up
0
zenyatta22 at hotmail
8 years ago
Process handling is not available when using a blocking socket! Bear this in mind.
up
0
wm161 at wm161 dot net
8 years ago
When you are running a script inside of a loop that checks a socket, and it hangs on that checking (Either by flaw or design), it can't handle signals until some data is received.

A suggested workaround would be to use the stream_set_blocking function, or stream_select on the offending reads.
up
0
codeslinger at compsalot dot com
9 years ago
I ran into an interesting problem. CLI 4.3.10 Linux

The parent forked a child.  The child did a bunch of stuff, and when it was done it sent SIGUSR1 to the parent and immediately exited.

Result:
The child turned into a zombie process waiting for the parent to harvest it, as it should.

But the parent was unable to harvest the child because it was receiving an endless barrage of SIGUSR1s.  In fact, it logged over 200000 before I shut it down (SIGKILL).  The parent was not able to do anything else (respond to other events) during that time.

No, it wasn't a bug in my child code.  Apparently, after sending a signal there is some "behind the covers" work that needs to occur to acknowledge signal completion, and when you exit immediately it is not able to happen, so the system just keeps trying.

Solution:  I introduced a small delay in the child, after sending the signal, and before exiting. 
No more Sig loops...

----------

P.S.  With respect to the note below.  The whole point of the sleep function is to enable the processing of other events.  So, yes, your non-renterent code, will suddenly get re-entered when you do a sleep, because you have just handed off control to the next pending event.

Ignoring the signal is only an option if the signal is unimportant to your program....   The better way to approach it, is to not do lengthy processing inside of the signal event.  Instead set a global flag and get the heck out of there as fast as possible.  Allow another part of your program to check the flag and do the processing outside of the signal event.  Usually your program is in some kind of loop when it is receiving signals, so checking a flag regularly shouldn't be a problem.
up
0
ieure at php dot net
9 years ago
Some weird signal interactions going on here. I'm running PHP 4.3.9.

sleep() calls seem to be interrupted when any signal is received by the PHP script. But things get weird when you sleep() inside a signal handler.

Ordinarily, signal handlers are non-reentrant. That is, if the signal handler is running, sending another signal has no effect. However, sleep() seems to override PHP's signal handling. If you sleep() inside a signal handler, the signal is received and the sleep() is interrupted.

This can be worked around like this:

function handler($signal)
{
    // Ignore this signal
    pcntl_signal($signal, SIG_IGN);

    sleep(10);

    // Reinstall signal handler
    pcntl_signal($signal, __FUNCTION__);
}

I don't see any mention of this behavior in the documentation.
up
0
daniel[at]lorch.cc
12 years ago
There are two documents I consider reading:

  Unix Signals Programming
  http://users.actcom.co.il/~choo/lupg/tutorials/

  Beej's Guide to Unix Interprocess Communication
  http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~beej/guide/ipc/

Also, have a look at the manpage:

  http://www.mcsr.olemiss.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?signal+5
up
-1
Holger Hees
6 years ago
you should use following code to prevent situation described by anxious2006 (children exit near simultaneously)

public function sig_handler($signo){
  switch ($signo) {
    case SIGCLD:
      while( ( $pid = pcntl_wait ( $signo, WNOHANG ) ) > 0 ){
        $signal = pcntl_wexitstatus ( $signo );
      }
      break;
  }
}
To Top