require

(PHP 4, PHP 5, PHP 7, PHP 8)

Выражение require работает идентично выражению include, за исключением того, что выражение require также выдаёт фатальную ошибку уровня E_COMPILE_ERROR, если возникла ошибка. Другими словами, выражение require остановит выполнение скрипта, тогда как выражение include только выдаёт предупреждение уровня E_WARNING, которое разрешает скрипту продолжить работу.

Документация по выражению include рассказывает, как это работает.

Добавить

Примечания пользователей 3 notes

up
148
chris at chrisstockton dot org
17 years ago
Remember, when using require that it is a statement, not a function. It's not necessary to write:
<?php
require('somefile.php');
?>

The following:
<?php
require 'somefile.php';
?>

Is preferred, it will prevent your peers from giving you a hard time and a trivial conversation about what require really is.
up
31
Marcel Baur
3 years ago
If your included file returns a value, you can get it as a result from require(), i.e.

foo.php:
<?php
return "foo";
?>

$bar = require("foo.php");
echo $bar; // equals to "foo"
up
2
jave dot web at seznam dot cz
10 months ago
Always use __DIR__ to define path relative to your current __FILE__.
(Or another setting that is originally based on __DIR__/__FILE__)

try & catch - don't get confused by the words "fatal E_COMPILE_ERROR" - it's still just an internal Error that implements Throwable - it can be caught:

<?php
try {
require(
__DIR__ . '/something_that_does_not_exist');
} catch (
\Throwable $e) {
echo
"This was caught: " . $e->getMessage();
}
echo
" End of script.";
?>

Note that this will still emit a warning "Failed to open stream: No such file or directory..." ...unless you prefix the require with "@" - which I strongly don't recommend as it would ignore/supress any diagnostic error (unless you have specified set_error_handler()). But even if you'd prefix the require with "@" it would still be caught.
To Top